Physical child abuse has been associated with a myriad of harms, not limited to physical injury. Thus, it is vital that children are protected. Forensic psychologists who are required to assess future risk of physical abuse often use the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 Version 3 (HCR-20V3), a well-established tool for general violence. However, the validity of the HCR-20V3 amongst perpetrators of physical child abuse has not yet been established and, whilst there are likely to be similarities between the two groups, there may also be important differences. We explore the potential strengths and limitations of the HCR-20V3 when used with perpetrators of physical child abuse, with reference to the developing evidence base for this type of offence, including indications of unique risk factors that may merit additional attention.

Keywords: HCR-20; Physical child abuse; Child maltreatment; Recidivism; Risk assessment; Risk management.

Vol 5, Issue 2, October 2024